|
|
Hey, only two months since the last one!
|
Return to Index |
|
|
Restaurant Progress and I have some history.
It
may very well be that I will come to regret dredging up that history,
but I’m going to do it anyway. First, because there’s an interesting
little behind-the-scenes story here that’s never been told (publicly).
And second, because I like to make good on promises when I can, even if
they’re nearly a decade old.
Some
of you will probably remember when Restaurant Progress exploded
onto the scene, back in ye olde year of 2017. Those who don’t will
hopefully forgive the cliché, but those who do will confirm that this
incendiary description of Progress’ debut is apt. At the ripe old age of
25, TJ Culp left the Sam Fox system, found a ramshackle little space in
Melrose, built it out with his own two hands (literally!), and opened
up a hip neighborhood bistro of sorts that was jam-packed to its rustic
wooden rafters practically from the moment he hung out his shingle.
The
degree to which Restaurant Progress was an instant grassroots sensation
cannot be exaggerated or overemphasized. It was a rare instance of the
Phoenix dining public immediately and enthusiastically rallying behind
exactly the kind of restaurant we food geeks wish they would support
more often — independent, quirky, thoughtful, distinctive and charming.
Note what’s missing there.
The
growing public narrative was that Restaurant Progress was not only one
of the best new additions to the Phoenix dining scene, but one of the
best restaurants in town, period. And as the gushing reviews poured into
Yelp (back before Yelp was curbstomped by Google Reviews), my editor
quite rightly started badgering me to get it on the review calendar.
Only there was a problem. |
|
|
|
|
The
hush hush scuttlebutt among the food geeks and industry folks was...
distinctly different than the public’s take. Part of being a dining
critic is building up a network of reliable sources. Not to inform your
opinions, of course. Anything written is based on personal experience
and personal experience alone. But rather as a surveillance network,
both to help you scout and optimize your time, and also to serve as a
check — confirmation that your experience isn’t substantially different
from everybody else’s. And what my network told me at the time was
unanimous: Progress wasn’t ready for prime time.
While
the Yelpers couldn’t get enough, every single report I got back from
people whose palates I trusted was that Progress was adorable, it
was exactly the kind of place we needed, and they desperately wanted to
love it, but their meal was mediocre. Or worse.
The
problem — contrary to the popular media archetype — is that the vast
majority of dining critics I know (myself included) do not go out
looking to write scathing reviews. The public may love to read them, but
most dining critics I know hate to write them. We get into this line of
work because we love to share great food, not because we enjoy making
somebody’s life miserable. Speaking for myself, a negative review is a
last resort. Every time I set foot in a restaurant, I go in hoping and
expecting to be delighted. And while there are high-profile openings
that will automatically get a review due to public interest, I’m also
not in the habit of plucking little independents out of obscurity just
so I can beat them up. I just don’t see the purpose in that. So, if I
publish a bad review while working as a professional critic, it’s
because A) a restaurant has failed to show me they can create a great
experience, despite me giving them multiple opportunities to do so, and
B) I’m in a situation where for whatever reason I can’t just pass them
over and write about somebody else instead**.
So I stalled.
Culp
was young, I figured, and he’d taken an incredibly brave and difficult
step. I hoped the reports I was getting were due to a combination of his
inexperience and the magnitude of the undertaking, and that he just
needed a little extra time to get the kinks worked out. I typically
wrote the reviews for notable new restaurants at the three-month mark,
but in this case, given the context and the massive discrepancy between
the public buzz and the insider buzz, I decided to wait and give him as
long as possible. So as my editor and department head pestered me to
hurry up and write about this amazing new restaurant their friends were
telling them about, I assured them I’d get to it while quietly kicking
the can down the road.
Patricia Escárcega foiled my plans.
|
|
|
|
Then-
critic at Phoenix New Times, Escárcega loved Progress. LOVED it. And
when she published a glowing review and called it maybe the best
new restaurant of 2017 at the mid-year mark, my time was up. There are
few things newspaper folks hate more than getting scooped, and my editor
— quite reasonably — told me in no uncertain terms that we would wait
no longer and I was to get to work on our review ASAP.
My
number one obligation was — and remains — to shoot straight. So I did.
While I tried to be as constructive as possible, I wrote the only review
I could: the honest one.
My experience was much more in line with my bewildered coterie of food
geeks’ than it was with Escárcega’s. Which is fine. Despite our best
efforts to get a broad sample, who knows if we had similar experiences?
And even if we did, we don’t have to agree.
Boy howdy, we didn’t. Readers howled. They hated
me for that one. Which is fine. Those who value popularity become
influencers. Those who value honesty are better suited to the role of
dining critic. Ironically, in the wake of the review, I heard from a few
folks in the industry who told me they agreed, but nobody had the heart
to tell Culp. (Pro Tip: You aren’t doing somebody a favor by being less
than honest with them. I get it, it’s awkward and uncomfortable to
offer constructive criticism to a friend, and it’s hard to do so gently
and with love, but when you lie through your teeth and say everything is
great, the only person you’re helping is yourself.)
Anyhoo,
things eventually calmed down, and we fast-forward to the end of 2017.
It’s time to write the Best New Restaurants list and yeah, there’s a big
ol’ elephant in the room. Clearly, I couldn’t include a restaurant I’d
given two stars (nor was I inclined to). But given the context and the
public support and how I framed the review, I decided to make a fourth
visit. If I felt they’d tightened things up in the interim and I had a
great meal more in line with the popular take, I’d add Restaurant
Progress to the list as some kind of honorable mention.
No
such luck. They hadn’t, and I didn’t. And moreover, without getting
into detail, it was made abundantly clear to me on that visit that I was
no longer welcome. Which, again, is fine. If I were in their shoes, I’d
probably have hated my guts too. But while I could see where Culp was
going and I wanted to follow Restaurant Progress in the hopes
it would meet its potential, I decided it would probably be best if I
just left it alone for a while.
“A
while” became a couple of years, a couple of years ran into the
pandemic, I left the Republic, and that was that. And though friends and
I discussed wanting to check back to see how things were going, we
never quite got around to it. Recently, however, news of their big accolades
combined with the fact that it has now officially been a Very Long Time
finally got me back in to visit Restaurant Progress once more.
Man, I loved it. |
|
|
|
burrata and fried eggplant with Calabrian chile |
|
|
|
It
is the space I remember, albeit warmed and cozied up with age. The room
is still charming, the staff and clientele are still hip, the drinks
are still excellent, the menu is still a tight and interesting (but not too interesting) collection of starters, mids and mains.
In terms of execution, though? This is a completely different restaurant than the one I visited in 2017.
This shouldn’t come as a surprise. It’s been over eight years
since my rather weird and awkward fourth visit. We’ve all changed in
the almost-decade since, and I’d expect no different from a chef who has
not only held down his OG spot, but also expanded his empire to
critical acclaim in the interim. (Sidebar: Sottise
is great! You should go there!) Still, it’s both striking and
satisfying to compare the dishes I remember to the dishes I just tasted.
We
had a lovely, simple endive Caesar, dusted with cheese and basted with a
lick of gently tart and pungent white anchovy dressing. I could do a
compare and contrast study in why this worked so well and why the salads
of 2017 didn’t, but while my lengthy preamble might suggest otherwise,
I’m more interested in talking about what Progress is now rather than
dwelling on what it was so long ago. |
|
|
|
clockwise from top left: pollo croquetas with fennel vin herbs | hiramasa crudo with kohlrabi and apple | Belgian endive Caesar |
|
|
|
Though
the Caesar was good, the crudo was dynamite. Hiramasa arrived in a
clean, vegetal juice — was it kohlrabi and apple? — topped with trout
roe, a bit of pungent grated fresh horseradish and a crisp apple
brunoise. It wasn’t buried in sugar or vinegar. It wasn’t toppings
first, fish second. It was a plate of delicate restraint, all of the
accompaniments humbly deferring to the hiramasa.
We
sampled some crisply fried chicken croquetas — smooth and creamy
within, with an herbed aioli of sorts beneath and a crown of lightly
dressed herbs and shaved fennel.
Also
deftly fried, the eggplant wasn’t anything special on paper, served
with burrata, mint and a melted, jammy red pepper
situation spiked with chile beneath. But the execution certainly
made it so. Every element sang. Chunks of cool burrata to tame scalding
slabs of soft eggplant with a breadcrumb coating that crackled, and a
gorgeous balance of sweet heat lurking below. All the comfort of
eggplant parm (sort of), made striking through careful preparation.
|
|
|
|
clockwise from left: handmade cappelletti and Italian sausage with collard greens | French style lasagna, charred and smothered in mornay | bay scallops in cauliflower potage |
|
|
|
In
Progress’ dim light, it was hard to visually distinguish the bay
scallops from the croutons that joined them, but honestly, that was part
of the fun. Sometimes you’d get a playful crunch, sometimes you’d sink
into a sweet and smoky scallop, strewn about a shallow bowl of
cauliflower potage, gentle and light and seasoned to pinpoint accuracy.
Pasta
arrived in two formats — a lusty, rich “French style” lasagna, toasted
at the edges and brimming with thick mornay. Meanwhile, make some pasta
ripiena with skill and you’ll make a friend of me. Culp’s cappelletti
were deftly done, joining perfectly round little marbles of Italian
sausage in a velvety sauce of potlikker and melted collards.
|
|
|
|
Two Wash Ranch chicken in a pomegranate harissa glaze |
|
|
|
Lamb
ribs were perfect, sporting a toasty bit of smoky char from their
seed-based dukkah crust, served with a smear of thick, complex mole and a
smattering of tart pomegranate seeds. And those Two Wash Ranch chickens
pack so much flavor into their diminutive little frames, particularly
when mopped with a pomegranate harissa glaze, all sweet and sour with a
little chile zing in one tight little package, served with a lusty
succotash and a bright shallot and herb salad.
I
might quibble with the tiramisu a bit, but really, the meal’s low water
mark was still quite good, and we had it with an excellent chocolate
cake and — in an offering that surely wasn’t designed for me but might
as well have been — a very good raspberry sorbet served on top of what I
can best describe as a sour, citrusy ice. Contrasting frozen textures
in the same bowl — one smooth, one chaotic — and man, it worked.
|
|
|
|
rack of lamb with house mole and dukkah | raspberry sorbet |
|
|
|
Dinner
was a delight. The menu was thoughtfully conceived, perfectly executed,
familiar but refined, and just straight-up damn tasty. It was
everything I’d hoped it would be when I first walked in eight and a half
years ago. How long has it been this way? Don’t know. Is it possible it
was always this way and I had incalculably bad luck? Well, no. That’s
what the network of spies is for — a warning system just in case I have
incalculably bad luck. I immediately texted news of my meal to a few of
those spies from back in the day, who told me to blink twice if I was
being held hostage. No, I assured them. It really was that good.
At
this point, Restaurant Progress certainly doesn’t need my endorsement.
They’re rapidly approaching their tenth birthday and I’m less than
relevant these days. And at the risk of speculating, I’m going to bet
they don’t particularly want my endorsement, either. Pretty sure I will
forever be — at best — tolerated at that place. But for what it’s worth,
they have it. This dinner was hit after hit after hit. And it makes me
very happy to see that Progress has grown into the restaurant it is
today.
I’d tell you to tell them I sent you, but... yeah, maybe don’t do that.
**
- There is, to be fair, a very rare exception where I think a
restaurant is cynically taking advantage of the public and I feel
compelled to go out of my way to call them out. I have only done this on
a few occasions, and I hope it’s abundantly clear this wasn’t one of
them.
|
|
|
|
It is unclear to me which organization dishes out the rank of “Five-Star Rice Meister,” but whichever it is, sign me up.
|
|
|
|
The Secret Undiscovered Gem That's
Absolutely To Die Fo— *BANG* |
|
|
|
Sometimes
I feel like my primary function within the Phoenix food media ecosystem
these days is to be the crotchety old guy who occasionally pops in
uninvited and tells everybody to chill the fuck out. Case in point: |
|
|
|
|
Spoiler: Not a fucking “secret.” Not fucking “hidden.” Not fucking “tapas.” “Izakaya” is... well, it’s a stretch.
The restaurant in question — to save you a click and a tediously basic influencer video — is Akamaru.
And it’s in plain sight, just a couple doors down from popular stalwart
Paradise Valley Burgers, in the mall where it’s been since the fall,
when as far as I can tell, every major food media outlet in town covered
it, not to mention lord knows how many influencers.
Such
is the state of food media these days: a hawker’s bazaar of quick cut
video set to trending audio, each claiming that they’re unlocking a
fabulous secret for you — the same secret sold (in many cases,
literally) by the 72 other hawkers you already scrolled past today.
I want to circle back to what Akamaru isn’t, but first I want to talk about what Akamaru *is*.
Akamaru
is an honest little neighborhood joint that serves some good food (and
some not as good food) and is absolutely worth a visit. And hopefully I
don’t have to lie to you and build it up as more than it is to hold your
attention.
Over
the past few years, “izakaya” has gone the way of “wagyu,” into the
realm of meaningless marketing buzzwords overused by people who latch
onto them because they don’t actually know much about the cuisine or the culture. Which isn’t to suggest that the people who run Akamaru don’t. They absolutely do. And I think it’s notable that the term they
use on their website is “izakaya-inspired experience,” which feels a lot more honest to me.
Akamaru
does have a nice little selection of Japanese beers and sake, and the
menu has a mix of nibbles and more substantial dishes that mostly go
well with booze. But this is less the kind of izakaya you’d find in
Japan and more a mix of Japanese cuisine and boilerplate American-Asian
standards — which is not inherently a bad or lesser thing! But it is
hardly an izakaya revolution. And perhaps more importantly, the room is a
little sterile, and I’m not sure this is where I’d want to spend a late
night hanging out with my friends, snacking and drinking, which is kind
of an izakaya’s thing. (Not that I could if I wanted to. They close at
9:30 on the weekends and earlier on weeknights.) But while the items
I’ve tried over the past few months at Akamaru are a little hit and
miss, the hits are good enough that I think it's a nice
neighborhood restaurant and I'd like to try more.
|
|
|
|
The
karaage I sampled was a little on the oily side, but it was tender and
tasty, with a squirt of lemon and a nip of Kewpie mayo. I’d get it
again. Squid stuffed with “creamy crab mayo” was less compelling, owing
to a murky filling and a really clunky eel sauce drizzled on top.
The
Gindaco takoyaki require some explanation. Here in Phoenix, you have
probably never had the kind of takoyaki you would get in Japan. Heck,
even if you fly to Japan and go to Gindaco — the chain restaurant that
is the very namesake of these particular takoyaki — you won’t get
takoyaki like this. They’re seasoned balls of batter with a little
nugget of cooked octopus at the core, yes, but I’ve yet to find a place
in Phoenix that isn’t serving frozen takoyaki chucked in a deep fryer,
Akamaru included. “Gindaco takoyaki” doesn’t mean takoyaki made like
they do at Gindaco. It means Gindaco branded frozen takoyaki. And that’s
fine, there’s nothing wrong with them. But I’m waiting for the day when
an ambitious chef fires up an actual takoyaki grill, cooks them
fresh to order, and Phoenix diners complain that they aren’t crispy like
REAL Takoyaki. (Book it now... this will happen.) In any case, these
are as good as frozen takoyaki can be — better than most of the frozen
takoyaki around town — which is to say I enjoy them just fine and I’ll
happily order them again.
I've found Akamaru’s onigirazu and donburi to be much more consistently tasty. |
|
|
|
clockwise from top left: Gindaco takoyaki | chicken karaage | salmon and avocado onigirazu |
|
|
|
The
onigirazu are an interesting feature, mostly because I don’t think I’ve
ever seen them around the Valley before. I believe — check me on this —
that onigirazu is a more recent Japanese convention. It takes the form
of a rice sandwich of sorts — assorted fillings loosely pressed between
rice and wrapped in nori, not entirely unlike onigiri but in a different
form factor and featuring a much higher filling to rice ratio.
Akamaru’s chashu onigirazu is pretty darn tasty, stuffed with thick,
tender braised pork, some vegetables, and a beautiful whole egg, split
down the middle so you can see that nice, jammy yolk. I also gave the
salmon avocado onigirazu a spin. This is made with salmon flake, a
multipurpose Japanese ingredient comprised of salmon that’s been
seasoned, well-cooked, shredded and dried out a little. It’s a common
filling for onigiri, but here it’s layered with lettuce and avocado and a
healthy drizzle of mayo, and again, I ain’t mad. I’ll return to
demolish this again.
But
my favorite dish here is probably their unusually good gyudon. I don’t
want to oversell it. It isn’t drive across town good. But it’s a bowl of
quality rice, topped with tender shreds of sweet marinated beef,
saturated with the melted onions and jazzed up with a little jarred beni
shoga. It’s a little more utilitarian than it is artful, but it’s made
with care, it’s better than most, and it’s awfully satisfying. |
|
|
|
So
I guess what I’m trying to say is that Akamaru is not the showstopping
secret answer to your Japanese izakaya dreams. Rather, Akamaru is a
solid neighborhood restaurant that can be a little hit and miss, but
is generally great for a quick, tasty lunch or a casual dinner
with a good bottle of Japanese beer. And that’s enough to recommend. So
why can’t we just call it what it is? Why does everything have to be a
mindblowing undiscovered gem?
The
reason, of course, is that modern food media no longer exists to serve
the reader or the restaurant. It exists to serve itself. And in the
attention economy, that means a constant state of piling up breathless,
shiny content, day after day after day. This is incredibly destructive to a healthy restaurant scene, but it’s for reasons that I don’t think most people realize.
The
core of the problem is this: Everyone is trying to sell you the
undiscovered gem. But the undiscovered gem is dead. It no longer exists.
In an online media ecosystem teeming with hordes of influencers who can
only distinguish themselves from one another by being the first to tell
you about a restaurant, whether or not the food is any good is
completely irrelevant. Pretty pictures and unqualified raves reign
supreme. Everything under the sun is unearthed immediately, encapsulated
in short format video, described with rapturous, guttural ecstasy and
placed on a pedestal as the latest mouthwatering jewel you simply MUST
consume. Until the next one comes along seven seconds later.
Put another way, the gems are no longer lost in the earth. Instead, they’re lost in an endless display of fake gems.
Twenty
years ago, food media was dominated by a handful of pros who couldn’t
possibly eat it all, so we needed diggers. Enter the amateur food
journalists. But times and technology have changed. We don’t need
diggers anymore, and now we’re saddled with tens of thousands of them,
all fighting for our attention. (And free food and money, but I
digress...) What we need now are people who have the experience and
perspective to discern and highlight which of these places are
worthwhile and teach us why. And even more importantly, we need people
who we can trust to tell us the *truth* about which are worthwhile and
which are not. But media is no longer structured in a way that
incentivizes expertise and rigor. Social media incentivizes quantity. As
much content as possible. As quickly as possible. The more flashy and
hyperbolic, the better.
So
nowadays, every time we’re lucky enough to discover and unearth the Ark
of the Covenant, we quickly box it up and bury it in a warehouse, never
to be seen again. |
|
|
|
.........okay,
bad example. Probably best the Ark stays buried. But hopefully the
point is made. After two decades of food nerds fighting to level the
playing field and give great little restaurants a chance to shine, this
insatiable need for constant discovery and kneejerk impulse to bill
every single thing under the sun as the Greatest Discovery Ever has
perversely put us back at square one, right where we were twenty years
ago:
The little spots that deserve the attention are lost, once again. |
|
|
|
Welp, I just gave myself a nice big sad, so here’s something incredibly cool I encountered on a recent trip to Tokyo.
One
chilly December evening, my son and I dropped into a tiny little
tempura joint in a quiet part of Asakusa, well away from madcap bustle
of Senso-ji and Kappabashi-dori. And we were treated to a lovely short
format omakase by a fellow who showed some serious skill at the fryer —
nice enough that I would have remembered this dinner for quite a while,
even if it hadn’t been for the final course: |
|
|
|
Are
you freaking kidding me? How hilarious is this?! Sure enough, our
friendly Tokyo tempura chef fully endorsed Tajín on his kakiage. A brief
conversation ensued in (my limited and brutally mangled) Japanese about
how we hailed from Arizona and knew Tajín well. It was a dumb little
cross-cultural exchange of untold beauty, and a good lesson about what
people do and do not consider “authentic.”
So was it any good?
Weeeeeeeellllll, let’s just say I’ll stick to shichimi. But I love that this *exists*. |
|
|
|
A regular segment, wherein I attempt to combat food media’s (and my own) recency bias. |
|
|
|
Guerrero-Style White Pozole at Requinto
— Honestly, this was even better than when I wrote the review a couple
of years back. Erick Pineda has this steamy bowl of tender pork and
hominy with all the fixin’s dialed in tight, and it starts and ends with
that killer, rich broth. Yup... still kicks ass.
Italian Beef at Luke’s of Chicago
— Portillo’s is packed, but Cary and Joel at Luke’s really deserve some
more love. What Luke’s might sometimes lack in consistency it sure as
shit makes up for by reaching greater heights, and this recent specimen
was maybe the best I’ve had there, tender and sweet, sopping with
flavorful jus, and laser-focused on the natural flavor of the beef.
Yup... still kicks ass.
Chopped Salad at Source
— I still can’t believe that one of my favorite Claudio Urciuoli dishes
of all time is a freaking chopped salad. But damned if I won’t keep
coming back for this light and punchy little number, all minced up with
salami and cheese and garbanzo beans and those fabulously crispy
breadcrumbs dressed with — as always — top notch olive oil and vinegar.
Yup... still kicks ass. |
|
|
|
Woo,
buddy, hammered out those... <checks word count... yikes>...
4000+ words in just a few hours and it’ll be a miracle if this edition
isn’t riddled with embarrassing errors. But as usual, I have decided
that writing something too long or too short (or too crappy) is better
than writing nothing at all.
Incidentally,
I have made a pledge that various stages of my secret project are not
allowed to proceed until I have finished up a Something to Doux
newsletter first. |
|
|
|
We’ll see if I stick to it ;-)
Thanks as always for letting me rant as usual, y’all. Pretty sure it’s you doing me the favor these days. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|